Research Updates in Psychiatry for 2010


Too Much “Screen Time” May Lead to Substance Use

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends keeping daily television viewing to no more than two hours per day, on the basis of research linking excessive TV to behavioral problem, poor body image, and other issues (AAP Policy Statement, Pediatrics 2001;107(2):423– 426). Recently a group of researchers in Kentucky conducted a study to examine whether time spent watching TV or playing video games in elementary school correlates with substance use.

Previous studies found a correlation between the amount of “screen time” and substance use in middle school and high school students, but not specifically among elementary schoolers. In this study, 4,691 fourth- and fifth-graders living in Kentucky were surveyed using the California Healthy Kids Survey and asked about their TV and gaming time, their substance use, and their home and school life. The results were disturbing.

First, a significant proportion of the kids surveyed reported substance use—tobacco, alcohol, sniffing solvents, marijuana, or other illicit drugs. Twenty-one percent reported they had drunk alcohol, 9% reported they’d smoked tobacco, 7% reported they’d chewed tobacco, 4.8% reported sniffing solvents, 1.6% reported they’d smoked marijuana (although an endearing 9% stated they didn’t know what marijuana is), and 1.3% reported other illicit drug use. Alcohol use, solvent sniffing, marijuana use, and tobacco chewing were correlated with more time spent watching TV or playing video games.

It stands to reason that lack of parental supervision would explain high levels of both TV/video time and substance use, so the authors tried to control for the level of parental involvement. In lieu of direct measurement of supervision, several questions on the survey addressed the degree of interest or involvement the children experienced, for example: “Does a parent or some other grown-up at home care about your school work?” “Does a parent or some other grown-up at home want you to do your best?” “Does a parent or some other grown-up at home listen when you have something to say?”

Lack of parental involvement also increased the odds of substance use, as did being teased about one’s weight (Armstrong KE et al., Public Health Reports 2010;125:433–440).

CCPR’s Take: As clinicians, this study is a sharp reminder that even our younger patients may be using substances, and we should screen for use accordingly. Substance abuse starts early, and may be increased by messages on TV and perhaps in video games. Parents should be encouraged to adhere to the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation to limit their children’s TV viewing to two hours a day of educational programming, and in the words of Captain Kangaroo, “spend more quality time with your little ones.”


Habit Reversal Training Effective Treatment for Tourette’s Syndrome

The first line treatment for patients with Tourette’s syndrome is low-dose, high potency antipsychotic medications. Ziprasidone (Geodon) and risperidone (Risperdal) have been proven to be effective in reducing the severity of tics in children, although not for eliminating them (Salee FR et al., J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psych 2000;39(3):292–299; Scahill et al., Neurology 2003;60(7): 1130–1135). For many families, the risk of using antipsychotics long term is daunting, and if a different treatment were to prove as effective, it would be welcome. Recently, a group of researchers examined the efficacy of comprehensive behavioral intervention therapy (CBIT) for the treatment of Tourette’s syndrome.

One hundred and twenty-six children, ranging in age from nine to 17 years (mean age 11.7) with Tourette’s syndrome were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: a special type of behavioral therapy called comprehensive behavioral intervention therapy (CBIT) (61 patients), or a control that consisted of supportive therapy and education, the usual adjuncts to medication (65 patients). Each group had eight sessions of their assigned therapy over a course of 10 weeks. Responders received three monthly “booster treatments” and were evaluated at three and six months post-treatment. Participants were aware of their assigned condition, but evaluators were not.

Thirty eight percent of children entering the study continued taking their tic-suppressing or other psychiatric medication throughout the study, as long as they had been on a stable dose for six weeks and made no changes throughout the course of the research. These children were randomly assigned to each group, and there were no significant between-group differences in regard to medication.

The CBIT focused mainly on habit reversal training. This practice teaches children to recognize when a tic is about to occur and engage in a voluntary behavior that is incompatible with the tic until the urge passes. For example, for children with a neck-jerking tic, this might mean looking down and tensing the neck until the urge goes away. According to researchers, this teaches children to establish behavior that counters the urge to perform the tic, rather than just suppresses the tic.

CBIT resulted in significantly greater reduction in tic severity, based on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (from 24.7 to 17.1), than the control treatment (24.6 to 21.1). Significantly more CBIT participants were rated “very much improved” or “much improved” on the CGI-I scale compared to control participants (52.5% vs. 18.5%). Six months after treatment, 87% of available CBIT participants were continuing to benefit from the treatment (Piacentini J et al., JAMA 2010;303(19):1929–1937).

CCPR’s Take: This research is good news for our patients with Tourette’s syndrome. The 31% decrease in scores on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale is very close to the decreases seen with antipsychotics (35% for Geodon and 36% for Risperdal). A low drop-out rate may indicate that children and families are willing to give this intervention a try. In addition, there were no cases of tic worsening during the therapy, so there is no reason to discourage CBIT. The researchers point out that they lacked data on the severity of tics before starting medication for the participants who were on tic-suppressing medication at the start of the study. This leaves a question as to whether these kids were improving already as a result of their meds. However, the risks of habit reversal training are low, and the gains may be substantial.

Research Updates in Psychiatry for 2010

This article originally appeared in:

The Carlat Psychiatry Report
Click on the image to learn more or subscribe today!

This article was published in print 7/15/2010 in Volume:Issue 1:2.

The Carlat Psychiatry Report

Carlat Publishing provides clear, authoritative, engaging, independent psychiatric education to make you look forward to learning, with the goal of helping you feel smarter, more competent, and more confident in your ability to help your patients become happy. We receive no corporate funding, which allows a clear-eyed evaluation of all available treatments. Learn more and subscribe to one of their newsletters here.


APA Reference
Psychiatry Report, T. (2014). Research Updates in Psychiatry for 2010. Psych Central. Retrieved on October 22, 2020, from


Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 10 Mar 2014
Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 10 Mar 2014
Published on All rights reserved.